3D Laser Scanning & BIM in Construction

The construction industry has a well-documented problem with existing-conditions data. A GC commits to a prefab MEP layout routed against CAD drawings that haven’t been field-verified. Years of tenant improvements, informal ceiling modifications, and unrecorded structural work mean the real building diverges from the drawings by 3 to 4 inches in critical locations. The prefab ductwork arrives on site and collides with structure that the drawings don’t show in that position. On a mid-size commercial renovation, that scenario produces a $40,000-$120,000 rework change order and an 18-day schedule slip. The scan that would have caught it in the first hour of modeling typically costs $8,500 or less.

This piece breaks down the full scan-to-BIM workflow, gear specs, LOD economics, and the specific risk categories where laser scanning delivers measurable ROI - with the numbers attached.

---

Why Construction Projects Fail Without Accurate Existing-Conditions Data

McKinsey’s 2015 report The construction productivity imperative found that 98% of megaprojects suffer cost overruns of more than 30%, and 77% are at least 40% late. Inaccurate project data and poor information management are consistently among the top contributors to overruns across project sizes - a finding that holds up in every field conversation: bad dimensional data creates a cascade that compounds through every trade.

The failure mode is structurally identical across project types. A GC orders prefab MEP runs sized and routed against drawings that haven’t been field-verified. Tenant improvements, structural modifications, and informal field changes have accumulated over years. The real building diverges by 3 to 4 inches in critical locations. The ductwork arrives on site and collides with structure that isn’t on the drawings. On a tenant improvement, that’s a $40,000-$120,000 rework change order and a multi-week schedule slip. On a hospital renovation, those numbers multiply.

Three distinct risk categories live inside that failure mode:

1. Dimensional mismatch risk - prefab elements (steel, MEP skids, curtain wall panels) don’t fit because shop drawings were dimensioned off unreliable data. Tape measure and field sketch introduce ±1-2 inch human error under ideal conditions. A Trimble X7 terrestrial laser scanner delivers ±2-3 mm total system accuracy across an entire building, registered and verified. That’s a 10-25x improvement in precision - enough to stake prefab coordination on.
2. Clash/coordination risk - the design model conflicts with real-world obstructions that drawings omit: hidden conduit runs, beam pockets, pipe sleeves, columns that aren’t where drawings say they are.
3. Permit and occupancy documentation risk - no verified as-built record to support CO applications, permit submittals, or future renovation design.

---

The Scan-to-BIM Construction Workflow: From Tripod to Coordinated Model

The full scan-to-BIM workflow has six phases, each a control point where errors can be caught - or introduced if the work is done carelessly.

Step 1 - Mobilization & Site Prep

Scan positions are defined before arriving on site. For interior spaces, that means one position every 10-15 feet with minimum 30% overlap between adjacent scans - typically one position per 400-600 sq ft of usable floor area in open-plan spaces, and one per enclosed room in cellular layouts. For an occupied office floor, access windows are coordinated with the GC superintendent to avoid conflicts with active trades. Scanners are sensitive to heavy vibration and dense airborne dust; site conditions are documented and instruments protected accordingly.

Step 2 - Field Capture

Our primary instrument is the Trimble X7 terrestrial laser scanner, which captures 500,000 points per second at medium density (6 mm point spacing at 10 m). A 3-story, 20,000 sq ft commercial building typically requires 80-120 scan positions and 4-6 hours of field time for a two-person crew - one full mobilization day for a building that would take two days to sketch by hand, at a fraction of the accuracy. For specific scopes where geometry or access warrants it, handheld scanners (including the Creaform MetraSCAN) are deployed for detailed or hard-to-access areas.

Step 3 - Registration

Registered point clouds are processed in Trimble Perspective. Both target-based and cloud-to-cloud registration are used depending on site geometry. Output is a registered RCP/RCS or E57 file with residual error at or below 2 mm. Registration residuals are documented in a QA report delivered with every project - this is not optional.

Step 4 - BIM Modeling

The registered point cloud imports into Autodesk Revit via ReCap Pro. Structural, architectural, and MEP families are traced against the cloud. Production rates by LOD:

• LOD 200: 1,200-1,800 sq ft per modeling hour
• LOD 300: 800-1,000 sq ft per modeling hour
• LOD 350: 600-900 sq ft per modeling hour - every hanger, sleeve, and clearance zone captured

For a hospital MEP floor at LOD 350, expect 40-60 modeling hours per floor plate (10,000-12,000 sq ft) due to system density. A typical 8,000 sq ft tenant improvement at LOD 300 runs 8-12 modeling hours. That 5-6x staffing difference is what makes LOD selection consequential, not academic.

Step 5 - QA/QC

Every modeled element is checked against the point cloud using deviation color maps in CloudCompare. Any element deviating more than 3 mm from the cloud gets flagged and re-checked before delivery. This is the mechanism behind our written accuracy guarantee - not a marketing claim but a process with a documented output.

Step 6 - Deliverable Handoff

Final deliverables include the .RVT Revit model, linked point cloud (RCP), PDF drawing set, and IFC for non-Revit platforms. The standard turnaround breakdown: raw registered point cloud delivered within 24 hours of scan completion; Revit model at LOD 300 delivered within 3 business days; full package (model, drawings, deviation report, IFC) at day 5. Clients who need to know how to import a point cloud into Revit get documentation on file formats and linking workflows included with every project.

---

Gear That Makes 2-3 mm Accuracy Achievable on Construction Sites

Scanner selection directly determines whether your coordination data is reliable enough to stake prefab orders on. Here is how our primary instrument performs in practice - and why the differences matter for construction risk.

Trimble X7 - Self-leveling with automatic vibration compensation. On an active construction site where floor vibration from other trades is constant, self-leveling is not a convenience feature - it’s what keeps your registration from drifting. Range: 80 m. Range accuracy: ±2 mm; 3D point accuracy approximately 3.5-4 mm at 10 m. Scan speed: 500,000 points per second. Point density at medium setting: 6 mm spacing at 10 m. Scan cycle: approximately 2 minutes per position. This is the go-to instrument for occupied buildings and tight daily access windows where speed and setup simplicity are critical.

Handheld scanners (including the Creaform MetraSCAN) - Deployed for parts, detailed component work, and reverse-engineering scopes where a terrestrial scanner cannot access geometry or where higher surface detail is required. These complement the terrestrial workflow on projects with complex components, tight spaces, or fabrication-level documentation needs.

For context, other instruments common across the industry - such as the Leica RTC360 (1.9 mm @ 10 m, 2 million points per second) and the FARO Focus Premium (±1 mm @ 10 m, 150 m range) - offer comparable accuracy tiers and each carries trade-offs in speed, range, and site suitability. The performance threshold that matters for construction coordination is ≤3 mm total system accuracy, which rules out consumer-grade devices and older-generation instruments with materially higher range error at distance.

Software Stack:

Why does scanner accuracy matter so specifically for construction coordination? The Trimble X7’s ±2 mm range accuracy holds an error budget that keeps total system accuracy at 3 mm or better across a full building - the threshold that makes shop drawing coordination reliable. At 3 mm total system accuracy, a prefab duct run on the far side of a 25-foot-wide mechanical room is positioned within 2-3 mm of truth. A scanner with materially higher range error at distance introduces enough positional uncertainty that combined with modeling tolerance, you’re approaching the ±6-12 mm range where prefab coordination assumptions become unreliable. That’s the performance gap that determines whether your scan produces a coordination tool or an approximation.

---

Quantifying the Risk Reduction: Where Laser Scanning Pays for Itself

The Navigant Construction Forum benchmarks direct construction rework at roughly 5-6% of contract value, rising to approximately 9% when indirect and overhead costs are included. On a $10 million renovation, that’s $500,000-$900,000 in potential waste, not all of it recoverable through change orders. Some eats contingency, some delays subcontractor payments, some turns into disputes.

Rework events commonly cause multi-week schedule delays per occurrence. A scan mobilization adds 1-3 days to project kick-off. That is the trade: spend 3 days before ground breaks, avoid weeks mid-project when every day costs exponentially more in stacked trade labor and delay damages.

There is also an insurance and liability dimension that doesn’t appear in the ROI table. A documented existing-conditions scan before demolition begins creates a factual baseline your design and legal teams can rely on. Pre-existing cracks, floor settlement, damaged finishes - all timestamped and geo-referenced. When a subcontractor files a differing-site-conditions claim six months into a job, the day-one point cloud is a powerful document in your dispute file - accurate, timestamped existing-conditions documentation that your team’s own professionals can then interpret and act on.

For a detailed pricing breakdown, see our post on 3d-laser-scanning-cost.

---

Construction Risk Categories Laser Scanning Directly Addresses

1. Dimensional and Fit Risk

Prefab coordination lives or dies on dimensional accuracy. Structural steel, MEP skids, curtain wall panels, and precast components are manufactured to shop drawing dimensions that must match field reality. A prefab piping skid designed against dimensions taken from a structural drawing that hasn’t been field-verified can arrive deep into fabrication and not fit because of a multi-inch discrepancy at a structural connection point. A scan before the design phase catches that condition in the first hour of modeling.

Laser scanning replaces assumptions with hard numbers. The Trimble X7 delivers ±2-3 mm total system accuracy - sufficient to stake fabrication on. Tape measure surveys deliver ±12-25 mm on a careful day. That gap is where rework lives.

2. Clash Detection

Loading a verified point cloud into Navisworks alongside the design model surfaces every real-world obstruction that drawings omit. This is model-versus-reality clash detection, not model-versus-model - the latter only catches conflicts between things that were drawn. Standard coordination tolerances in Navisworks: 6 mm hard clash (physical intersection), 25 mm soft clash clearance zone (minimum required separation for insulated pipe, cable tray working space, and code-required duct clearances). Those settings are not arbitrary - the 25 mm soft zone is calibrated to catch conflicts that tape measurement would miss but that matter for insulation, access, and code compliance.

See how we approach clash detection tolerances in scan-to-BIM coordination for specifics on tolerance settings and conflict severity thresholds.

3. Structural Deviation

Post-pour concrete slab flatness, column plumb, beam camber - measurable properties that affect every trade that follows. We generate deviation color maps that flag pours not meeting ACI 117 tolerances before the next trade moves in. For occupied commercial floors, slab flatness and levelness thresholds defined in ACI 117 (such as FF/FL minimums for slabs on grade) provide the reference standard; any pour falling short needs grinding or shimming before flooring, raised access, or equipment installation proceeds. A deviation map flags that condition on a freshly poured slab - caught before the next trade mobilizes rather than after.

4. As-Built Documentation for Permits and CO

Jurisdictions increasingly accept - and some now require - scan-derived as-built drawings for permit submittals and certificate of occupancy applications. A BIM-derived PDF drawing set at the correct scale and LOD compresses drafting time from weeks to days. See our article on as-built drawings for permit and occupancy applications for jurisdiction-specific guidance.

5. Existing-Condition Disputes

Pre-construction scanning creates a timestamped, geo-referenced baseline of conditions before crews touch anything. When a subcontractor files a differing-site-conditions claim, the day-one point cloud is a definitive existing-conditions record your team’s professionals can rely on. No dispute about when a crack appeared or whether a column was already out of plumb.

6. Renovation and Adaptive Reuse

Adaptive reuse projects on buildings 20 years or older carry inherent risk from drawings that no longer reflect reality. Consider a warehouse conversion to mixed-use residential/retail where the design team assumes a flat slab and sketches column base plate layouts before field verification. A terrestrial scan can reveal slab elevation variation of ±2.5 inches or more across a large footprint - a condition invisible in any drawing set. When base plate elevations vary that much across a floor, a structural engineer committing to uniform base plate heights and shimming depths without scan data will require re-engineering after steel fabrication has started. Catching slab variation before the structural engineer finalizes the design is the difference between a design-phase adjustment and a fabrication revision. On a single pre-design deliverable, that ROI ratio - scan cost versus avoided re-engineering - routinely exceeds 5x.

This is the strongest argument for scanning before design starts on any building older than 20 years. For more context on why original drawings are unreliable, see our article on the risks of relying on outdated building drawings before renovation.

---

LOD Levels in Construction Scan-to-BIM: Matching Detail to Project Phase

LOD selection determines how much modeling time you’re buying and what coordination problems you can solve with the output. The table below maps project types to LOD levels and includes modeling-hour estimates by discipline - because the staffing and timeline implications are where the decision actually lives.

LOD 200 (Conceptual/Schematic): Generic massing with approximate dimensions. Suitable for feasibility studies, early-phase budget takeoffs, and rough coordination checks. Production rate: 1,200-1,800 sq ft per modeling hour. Not suitable for fabrication or permit submittals.

LOD 300 (Design Development / Construction Documents): Exact geometry, true dimensions, materials tagged, system types assigned. Required for MEP coordination, fabrication clearances, and permit submittals. Production rate: 800-1,000 sq ft per hour. Minimum standard for most commercial renovation projects.

LOD 350 (Construction Coordination): Adds interface geometry - hanger locations, sleeve penetrations, insulation clearances, coordination zones. Every collision that Navisworks can surface against a 6 mm hard clash / 25 mm soft zone tolerance, it will find against an LOD 350 model. Production rate: 600-900 sq ft per hour.

LOD 400 (Fabrication): Fabrication-ready part geometry. Rarely derived from terrestrial laser scanning alone - typically requires combination with metrology-grade instruments or structured light scanning for tight-tolerance components.

The hospital MEP floor at LOD 350 versus the tenant improvement at LOD 300 can differ by 4-5x in MEP modeling hours alone - 40-60 hours versus 10-14 hours per 10,000 sq ft. That difference shows up directly in the quote and the delivery timeline, which is why LOD needs to be specified before scope is priced, not discovered after delivery.

For a full breakdown, see our post on LOD 200 vs LOD 300 in scan-to-BIM projects and the scan-to-bim-lod-guide reference resource.

---

When in the Construction Lifecycle to Deploy Laser Scanning

Each phase serves a distinct purpose with a distinct ROI profile. Here is how that value profile shifts by phase.

Pre-Design / Due Diligence: Scan before design starts on any building with no reliable drawings or drawings older than 10 years. The failure mode is consistent: drawings that predate significant tenant work, no field verification, and a change order that dwarfs the scan cost. A pre-design scan on a gut-rehab at that scale runs $8,000-$12,000. The structural engineer, MEP engineer, and architect all work off the same verified dataset from day one - no conflicting field measurements, no “which dimension do we trust” conversations mid-design.

Pre-Construction Coordination: Scan after structural steel erection but before MEP rough-in begins. A beam that’s 1.5 inches off its design location - not uncommon after erection and plumbing - is trivial to accommodate in the coordination model and expensive to work around after ductwork is hung. Verify steel matches the model before any rough-in trade commits to layout.

Mid-Construction Milestones: Scan after each major trade - concrete pour, structural steel, rough MEP - to create a dated record and feed forward into the next coordination cycle. On fast-track projects with parallel trades, a mid-construction scan at the rough MEP stage can prevent the second-fix trade from inheriting a coordination conflict that the first-fix trade introduced.

Pre-Close-Out: Scan completed spaces before drywall closes the ceiling. Every pipe, duct, conduit, and structural member is permanently documented in a point cloud. That record will answer maintenance, renovation, and dispute questions for the next 50 years of building ownership.

Post-Construction / Owner Handover: Final as-built BIM for facilities management, digital twin integration, and warranty baseline. An owner who takes possession of a $15M renovation with a verified as-built model has a document that pays dividends every time a future tenant improvement starts.

The cost of correction compounds as work proceeds. A steel connection that’s 1.5 inches off its design location costs almost nothing to adjust before welding and thousands after. A prefab duct run that collides with structure costs $30-80K to reroute after fabrication. The further into the project the error is discovered, the more labor, materials, and schedule are already locked in around it.

---

Deliverables Your GC, Architect, and Owner Should Demand

Registered Point Cloud: E57 or RCP format, ≤2 mm residual error, full color and intensity. Delivered within 24 hours of scan completion. E57 is the universal format - it opens in Revit, Navisworks, AutoCAD, ReCap, and CloudCompare without conversion.

Revit BIM Model: .RVT file with linked point cloud, organized by discipline (Architectural, Structural, MEP as separate models or workshared), correct LOD per project spec, all elements carrying basic parameters (material, size, system type, mark). Delivered within 3 business days (LOD 300) or 5 business days (LOD 350) of scan completion.

2D Drawing Set: PDFs derived directly from the BIM - floor plans, reflected ceiling plans, elevations, sections at specified scales. Not drafted from scratch: extracted from the Revit model so dimensions are BIM-accurate, not subject to redrafting error.

Deviation Reports: Color-mapped deviation analysis for slabs, columns, and facades, output as PDF with tolerance callouts - including explicit call-out of elements outside ACI 117 tolerances for slab work, or project-specified tolerances for structural elements. A deviation map without tolerance callouts is decorative; one with overlaid pass/fail thresholds is an actionable QA document.

IFC Export: For GCs or owners working in non-Revit platforms - Bentley OpenBuildings, Tekla Structures, or any openBIM workflow. Specify IFC 2x3 or IFC4 format upfront.

Full package turnaround summary: point cloud at 24 hours, Revit model at 3 days (LOD 300) / 5 days (LOD 350), full package including drawings, deviation reports, and IFC at day 5. Get these turnaround commitments in writing before the project starts.

Specify all required formats in the scope of work before work begins - not all vendors include the full deliverable set in their base quote. See our breakdown of what scanning deliverables to request and why and the laser scanning deliverable specification template for a full checklist.

---

Choosing a 3D Laser Scanning Partner for Construction Projects

The difference between a scan that prevents a major rework order and a scan that generates a point cloud nobody can use comes down entirely to vendor execution. Every question below has a right answer - and a red flag answer.

“What scanner do you deploy on construction sites, and what is its accuracy spec?”
Right answer: the vendor names the specific instrument and states its published accuracy specification - e.g., Trimble X7 (±2 mm range accuracy, ~3.5-4 mm 3D point accuracy at 10 m) or comparable professional-grade instruments at similar accuracy tiers. Red flag: “phase-shift scanner” or vague claims without a model name. If they can’t name the instrument and state its accuracy specification, they either don’t own professional-grade gear or can’t interpret its spec sheet.

“What is your registration accuracy target, and does the residual report come with the deliverable?”
Right answer: ≤2 mm residual, delivered as a project document. Red flag: “we meet industry standards” or any answer that treats registration QA as internal information not shared with the client. Registration residuals are your evidence that the point cloud is what it’s claimed to be.

“Do you model in-house or do you offshore the Revit work?”
Right answer: modeling is performed domestically by people accountable to the same project manager running the scan. Red flag: any variant of “we have a global team” without specifying that the Revit modeling is done domestically. Offshore modeling teams may be technically capable, but they may not be current on US building codes, US permit drawing conventions, or US construction trade sequencing - and there is a liability gap if model errors contribute to a field problem in a US jurisdiction.

“What are your insurance requirements and who do you name as additional insured?”
Right answer: minimum $1M per occurrence general liability, with the GC and owner named as additional insured on the GL policy. That last phrase - “named as additional insured” - is the language GCs and owners actually need on their COI requirements. A vendor who carries $1M GL but doesn’t automatically name the GC and owner as additional insured isn’t meeting standard construction subcontractor insurance requirements. Ask for a sample COI before you award the project.

“What is your turnaround SLA and how does it break down by deliverable?”
Right answer: point cloud within 24 hours of scan, Revit model at 3 days (LOD 300), full package at 5 business days. Red flag: “3-5 business days” with no breakdown. For active construction projects with trade sequencing, knowing whether the 5-day window means point cloud plus model at day 5 or point cloud at day 1 with model to follow is the difference between a usable coordination schedule and a missed sequencing window.

“How do you price a project?”
Right answer: they ask you for building size, age, floor count, estimated scan position count, LOD requirements, access constraints, and travel distance before they give you a number. Red flag: a price delivered in under five minutes without those questions. A quote produced without project specifics is not a real quote - it’s a placeholder that will change after the project starts.

At We Are Capture, we deploy a Trimble X7 terrestrial laser scanner as our primary instrument, with handheld scanners (including the Creaform MetraSCAN) for parts, detailed, and reverse-engineering work. We run field capture and registration ourselves; modeling and BIM are produced by vetted partner studios working under our QA, with one project manager accountable for your project end to end. We back every project with a written ±2-3 mm accuracy guarantee backed by delivered registration residual reports, along with a 24-hour point cloud / 3-day model / 5-day full package SLA. For a complete checklist of what to ask before you commit, see our scan-to-bim-quote-checklist.

---

FAQ

How much does 3D laser scanning cost for a construction project?

Typical industry ranges: a 10,000 sq ft tenant improvement runs $3,500-$7,000 for scan plus LOD 300 BIM. A mid-size 50,000 sq ft renovation is $12,000-$22,000. A 200,000 sq ft gut rehab runs $35,000-$60,000 and up depending on complexity and access. The variables that drive price: building complexity and number of distinct spaces, floor count (multi-story buildings require more positions and registration time), access restrictions (night work, occupied spaces, phased access), LOD required, and travel distance.

The number that matters most in evaluating that cost: one avoided MEP collision or structural interference conflict runs $30,000-$80,000 on a typical commercial renovation. For a full breakdown, see our posts on 3d-laser-scanning-cost and scan-to-bim-cost.

Can laser scanning prevent construction rework?

Yes - specifically by replacing assumption-based coordination with measured reality. Laser scanning replaces ±1-2 inch tape-measure data with ±2-3 mm point cloud data, then surfaces real-world conflicts in Navisworks at standard 6 mm hard clash / 25 mm soft clash tolerance settings. That means conduit runs that exist but aren’t on drawings, beam pockets blocked during a previous TI, structural elements out of position from design - all of these appear as flagged conflicts in the coordination model before they appear as field problems. The Navigant Construction Forum benchmarks rework costs in a range that makes the ROI of one avoided major rework event commonly 3-8x the cost of the entire scan scope.

What is the difference between LOD 200, LOD 300, and LOD 350 in a construction BIM model?

LOD 200 is generic massing with approximate dimensions - useful for early feasibility, not suitable for fabrication or permit submittals. 1,200-1,800 sq ft per modeling hour. LOD 300 delivers exact geometry, dimensions, materials, and system types; minimum standard for permit submittals and MEP coordination. 800-1,000 sq ft per modeling hour. LOD 350 adds interface geometry - hanger locations, sleeve penetrations, insulation clearances - necessary for full MEP coordination on complex buildings. 600-900 sq ft per modeling hour.

The staffing implication: a hospital MEP floor at LOD 350 runs 40-60 MEP modeling hours per 10,000 sq ft. A tenant improvement at LOD 300 runs 10-14 MEP hours per 10,000 sq ft. Specifying LOD after the quote is issued is how projects get re-scoped mid-delivery. See our detailed breakdown in the LOD 200 vs LOD 300 in scan-to-BIM projects post.

How accurate is 3D laser scanning on a construction site?

With a Trimble X7 (±2 mm range accuracy, ~3.5-4 mm 3D point accuracy at 10 m) and proper multi-scan registration, total system accuracy is ±2-3 mm across a typical building. Critical distinction: scanner range accuracy is not the same as project-level total system accuracy. Registration error and modeling tolerance both add to the final number. A properly executed project - correct target placement, cloud-to-cloud registration verified against targets, QA deviation check on all modeled elements - delivers ≤3 mm total system accuracy. Tape measure surveys deliver ±12-25 mm under good conditions. The 3 mm threshold is what makes prefab fabrication coordination reliable. Below it, shop drawing sign-off is grounded in real data.

What is the turnaround time for a scan-to-BIM project?

Our standard SLA broken down by deliverable: registered point cloud (RCP/E57) within 24 hours of scan completion; Revit BIM model at LOD 300 within 3 business days; full package - model, PDF drawings, deviation report, IFC export - within 5 business days. LOD 350 on MEP-dense projects (hospitals, data centers) may extend the model delivery to 4-5 days depending on floor plate complexity, but the point cloud is still available within 24 hours. For active construction projects with sequenced trades, get the SLA breakdown in writing before the project starts - “3-5 days” without a per-deliverable breakdown doesn’t tell you whether the coordination model is available before your next trade mobilizes.

What file formats does a 3D laser scanning company deliver for construction projects?

Standard deliverable set from We Are Capture: E57 or RCP registered point cloud (compatible with Revit, Navisworks, ReCap, AutoCAD, and CloudCompare); .RVT Revit BIM model at the specified LOD with linked point cloud; PDF drawing set at project scales derived directly from the BIM; IFC export (IFC 2x3 or IFC4 - specify upfront) for non-Revit platforms; deviation color map PDF with ACI 117 or project-specified tolerance callouts for slab and structural work. Optional deliverables: Navisworks NWD file for coordination review sessions, orthophotos from scan imagery. Specify format requirements in the scope of work before the project begins. The laser scanning deliverable specification template gives you a ready-to-send checklist.

---

Ready to Protect Your Construction Budget?

The pattern is consistent across commercial renovation work: projects that scan before design starts avoid the $40,000-$120,000 change orders. Projects that call after the ductwork doesn’t fit get an accurate point cloud of an expensive problem.

We deploy a Trimble X7 terrestrial laser scanner from our New York metro base and travel nationwide, with handheld scanners (including the Creaform MetraSCAN) for detailed and component-level work. We deliver registered point clouds within 24 hours and full Revit models within 3-5 business days, and back every project with a written ±2-3 mm accuracy guarantee and delivered registration residual documentation. We run field capture and registration ourselves; modeling and BIM are produced by vetted partner studios under our QA, with a single project manager accountable for your project end to end.

Tell us your building size, floor count, LOD requirement, and schedule, and we’ll have a project-specific number back to you the same day. Explore our full 3D laser scanning services or contact us directly to get started.