3D Laser Scanning for Building Inspections
Building inspections built on tape measures and eyeball surveys produce 10-25mm error tolerances on projects where a 5mm variance can invalidate a renovation design or kill a structural sign-off. We deploy professional 3D laser scanning services on commercial buildings from 2,000 to 500,000 sq ft, and the gap between a point cloud and a clipboard inspection shows up not in the spec sheet but in the change order log.
This article covers the workflow we run, the deliverables you receive, and exactly what to expect on cost and timeline.
Why Traditional Building Inspections Miss What 3D Scanning Catches
A tape-and-eyeball inspection produces measurements with ±10-25mm tolerance. That tolerance is acceptable when a rough floor plan is the only output. It becomes a liability when a structural engineer is checking column plumb against a 10mm design tolerance, a GC is pricing a curtain wall replacement to ±3mm shop drawing precision, or a buyer is underwriting a $10M acquisition based on leasable square footage from a seller’s decade-old PDF drawings.
The failure mode follows a consistent sequence. A missed out-of-plumb column or an undetected 30mm floor undulation does not surface until the renovation is framed. Then it becomes an RFI. Then a change order. Then a schedule overrun. A missed 28mm floor settlement zone that should have been caught in pre-design documentation can generate a substantial concrete leveling change order and schedule slip. Scanning fees for a typical building of that scope run approximately $5,500. The math is straightforward.
Point clouds capture building conditions at a single moment in time - a fixed, measurable record. That specificity matters in three contexts:
- Insurance claims: date-stamped scan data establishes pre-loss condition with sub-centimeter dimensional authority that an adjuster’s photo documentation cannot match
- Pre-purchase due diligence: a buyer relying on a seller’s decade-old as-builts is carrying undocumented risk that a one-day scan eliminates
- Accurate existing-conditions documentation: millimeter-level point clouds give the client’s own design, legal, and licensed professionals a precise, timestamped record of conditions - far beyond what a hand sketch or years-old photo can provide
Commercial real estate deals routinely involve 50,000-500,000 sq ft of space. Manual measurement at that scale is not just imprecise - at the station density required for renovation design (one measurement point per 1-2 sq ft), it is practically impossible to execute. The Trimble X7, our primary terrestrial laser scanner, captures at ranges up to 80m, covering most commercial floor plates efficiently.
Inspection types where we see the highest impact:
- Pre-acquisition due diligence (space verification, ceiling height audits, column grid confirmation)
- Structural condition assessments (floor flatness, beam deflection, settlement mapping)
- Facade crack mapping and curtain wall alignment surveys
- MEP as-built verification against construction documents
- ADA compliance audits (ramp slopes, door clearances, restroom turning radii)
See also: existing conditions documentation for renovation projects
The Gear: What We Deploy and Why
We match instrument to inspection scenario. Different accuracy, range, and logistics requirements exist across project types, and using the wrong instrument costs time and data quality.
Trimble X7 is our primary terrestrial laser scanner. It self-levels and auto-registers in the field - the instrument computes its own position relative to adjacent scans before you move it, which means you leave the site with a pre-verified point cloud rather than a raw data bundle that might have a registration problem hiding in it. The Trimble X7 has a maximum range of 80m (0.6m-80m) and delivers range noise of <3mm at 60m on 80% albedo target reflectance, with auto-leveling accuracy of <3 arc-seconds. On a tight commercial floor plate, the 80m range covers most of the space in 3-5 setups per floor. A 2-person crew scanning a 15,000 sq ft floor plate with moderate partition density typically runs 12-18 stations and completes that floor in under 90 minutes.
Handheld scanners - including the Creaform MetraSCAN, which delivers sub-mm accuracy - are deployed for detailed parts work, hard-to-access areas, and reverse-engineering applications where high-resolution capture of complex geometry is required. These complement the terrestrial scanner for work requiring close-range, high-detail coverage that a tripod-mounted instrument cannot efficiently reach.
For large open interiors, warehouses, tall facades, and difficult-access scenarios such as roofs and parking structures, we select terrestrial scanner configurations appropriate to the range and accuracy requirements of the specific job. The objective drives instrument choice, station density, deliverable format, and turnaround commitment.
All instruments produce ISO 17123-9 compliant data - the standard structural engineers require when scan-derived measurements are going into a report.
| Instrument | Best Inspection Scenario | Accuracy | Range | Approx. Scan Time/Station |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trimble X7 | Interior floor-by-floor, tight corridors, auto-registration needed | Range noise <3mm @ 60m (80% albedo) | 80m max | 2-3 min |
| Handheld scanner (e.g., Creaform MetraSCAN) | Detailed parts, complex geometry, hard-to-access areas, reverse engineering | Sub-mm | Short range | Continuous capture |
A typical 50,000 sq ft mid-rise requires 30-60 scan positions depending on partition density and floor count. We register everything in Autodesk ReCap Pro or Trimble RealWorks before we leave the job site, so the client never waits on a registration failure discovered two days later at the office.
Step-by-Step: How a Building Inspection Scan Actually Works
Step 1 - Scope definition. Before we book a mobilization, we identify the inspection objective precisely. A pre-purchase due diligence scan needs LOD 200 spatial documentation - we need the shell, floor plates, column grid, and ceiling heights, but we do not need wall construction details or mechanical routing. A structural condition report needs measurable deviation analysis with color-coded heat maps against a design baseline. An MEP as-built verification needs LOD 300 with system-level detail, which means pipe diameters, duct dimensions, and equipment clearances are all modeled to dimension. The objective drives instrument choice, station density, deliverable format, and turnaround commitment.
Step 2 - Site prep. We coordinate with building management for access windows, identify restricted areas requiring special scheduling, and lay target spheres or checkerboard targets at control points - typically every 15-20m across the floor plate. Review our site preparation checklist before the crew arrives to understand exactly what we need from your facilities team before mobilization day.
Step 3 - Field scanning. Station placement is systematic: every 5-8m of travel distance, with full overlap between adjacent scans. For a 50,000 sq ft occupied mid-rise, a 2-person crew typically completes field scanning in 4-6 hours. Occupied buildings add time - people and moving equipment create noise artifacts that require additional scan positions or return visits to shadow areas.
Step 4 - Registration. Point clouds are stitched in ReCap Pro or Trimble RealWorks. Our target is less than 2mm RMS registration error across the full building. On Trimble X7 deployments, the field registration report with per-scan residuals is generated at the scanner before we demobilize - we can show the client a color-coded residual map on a tablet before we pack the gear. The registration report lists each scan station, its XYZ position, the residual error to each neighboring scan, and the overall RMS. If any scan cluster shows residuals above threshold, we re-scan before the project advances. If your engineer asks to see that report, it is included in the project delivery package.
Step 5 - Deliverable production. Depending on scope: raw .RCP/.RCX point cloud, 2D CAD drawings extracted in AutoCAD, or a full Revit BIM model built trace-by-trace from the registered cloud. See how scan data becomes a BIM model in Revit for the full production pipeline.
Step 6 - Inspection analysis. For condition assessment work, we run deviation analysis in ReCap Pro or CloudCompare - overlaying design drawings against as-found conditions, generating color-coded heat maps, flagging out-of-plumb elements, and quantifying floor settlement across the scan area. The heat map exports as a georeferenced overlay you can bring into AutoCAD or Revit and share with a structural engineer or GC directly.
Step 7 - Handoff. Every project delivery includes a cloud-hosted viewer (Autodesk Construction Cloud or equivalent) so the client, inspector, and engineer can navigate the full scan without installing specialist software.
Deliverables: What You Actually Receive After a Scanning Inspection
| Deliverable | Format | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|
| Registered point cloud | .RCP (Revit), .E57 (open) | Permanent evidence layer; all downstream work derived from this |
| 2D CAD drawings | .DWG at 1:50 or 1:100 | Floor plans, sections, elevations for permits and renovation design |
| BIM model | .RVT (Revit), IFC 2x3/IFC4 | Spatial planning, renovation design, facility management |
| Deviation heat maps | PDF / georeferenced image overlays | Structural condition reports, settlement mapping, deflection analysis |
| Orthophoto elevations | Georeferenced TIFF/PDF | Facade condition reports, crack documentation, historic preservation |
| Structural deviation report | PDF with annotated plan + section views | Standalone condition assessment deliverable for structural engineers |
| PDF annotation report | Inspector-ready package with flagged anomalies and measurement callouts |
The registered point cloud is the foundational asset. Every other deliverable is derived from it, and the cloud itself lives in your project archive permanently - if a question surfaces three years later during a refinancing or an insurance dispute, the raw evidence is still there.
BIM deliverables are available in IFC 2x3 and IFC4 for teams working in Archicad, Bentley, or OpenBIM environments. We specify coordinate systems at contract stage - site local, state plane, or tied to survey benchmarks depending on downstream use.
Typical turnaround: 5-10 business days from field scan to final files. Expedited 48-72 hour delivery is available for CRE closings at a premium. For the complete breakdown of all file types and what to ask for in your contract, see the full list of scan deliverable formats.
BIM Integration for Commercial Real Estate Inspections
When the scan feeds a BIM model, inspection findings shift from a static PDF to a queryable data environment. Every flagged deflection, every non-compliant clearance, every crack location becomes a tagged object in Revit - searchable, measurable, and updatable as conditions change.
LOD Levels Explained for Inspection Work
The LOD number is not an arbitrary quality tier - it defines exactly what dimensional and descriptive information is modeled, and the right LOD for your inspection depends on what decisions the model has to support.
LOD 200 is the correct target for pre-acquisition due diligence and space-planning audits - not LOD 100 and not LOD 300. LOD 100 gives you massing only, with no accurate room dimensions or ceiling heights, which is insufficient for verifying leasable area against a lease abstract. LOD 300 adds wall construction details and MEP backbone routing, which a due diligence buyer does not need and will pay modeling hours for unnecessarily. At LOD 200 you get mass elements, accurate floor plates, the exterior shell with correct height dimensions, and the confirmed column grid - exactly the information needed to verify leasable area, ceiling heights (critical on a deal with a below-grade height disclosure risk), and spatial compliance against an offering memorandum.
LOD 300 is required when renovation drawings will be produced from the inspection model. At LOD 300, wall thicknesses, structural member dimensions, and MEP backbone routing are modeled to dimensional accuracy - a GC can price from the model without field re-measurement, which is the primary cost justification for the additional modeling time.
LOD 350 adds interface conditions between disciplines: how a column connects to a beam, how a duct penetrates a fire-rated wall assembly, exact anchor point geometry. We deliver LOD 350 on complex structural rehabilitation projects where trade coordination is the primary construction risk. A representative project type: a 1960s concrete frame office building with unreinforced masonry infill walls being converted to exposed-structure loft offices, where the GC needs to confirm beam-to-column connection geometry and infill panel thickness before demolition pricing. At LOD 350, those interface conditions are modeled from scan data, not assumed from era-typical construction details.
| LOD | What Is Modeled | Right Inspection Use Case | Typical Add-On Cost vs. Scan |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOD 200 | Shell, floor plates, column grid, ceiling heights | Pre-acquisition due diligence, space audits | +$1,500-$4,000 |
| LOD 300 | Above + wall construction, structural members, MEP backbone | Renovation design, GC pricing | +$3,000-$8,000 |
| LOD 350 | Above + full interface/connection geometry, penetrations | Structural rehab coordination, complex MEP retrofit | +$6,000-$15,000+ |
Scan-Derived BIM as a Facility Management Seed Model
Facility managers at portfolio-scale commercial owners are increasingly using scan-derived BIM as the seed data for CMMS platforms rather than re-capturing building data through traditional FM surveys. The practical reason: a traditional FM data capture for a 200,000 sq ft building - walking every room, manually logging equipment tags, dimensions, and room attributes - takes 3-5 days of field time and produces data with ±25mm dimensional accuracy. A scan-derived Revit model at LOD 300 produces the same spatial data in the same field time, with ±5mm accuracy, and also generates the as-built record and inspection documentation simultaneously.
In practice, platforms like Archibus and IBM Maximo ingest the IFC export from our Revit model and auto-populate space records (room name, number, area, occupancy type) and equipment records (asset tag, location coordinates, manufacturer data from linked schedules). For a 150,000 sq ft building, that eliminates approximately 40-60 hours of manual data entry that would otherwise precede a CMMS go-live. Planon users follow the same path via COBie export, where our Revit model exports a structured spreadsheet of spaces, equipment, and attributes that imports directly into the Planon space management module.
The data fields that actually get populated from a scan-derived LOD 300 model include: room boundary polygons (area auto-calculated), floor-to-ceiling height per room, structural bay dimensions, door and window openings with clear dimensions, and equipment location coordinates. What still requires manual field entry or O&M document review: equipment serial numbers, maintenance history, and warranty dates - scanning does not replace that data, but it provides the spatial scaffold those records attach to.
Specific Inspection Types That Benefit Most from 3D Scanning
Pre-purchase / CRE due diligence. We regularly scan buildings where the buyer’s team suspects discrepancies between seller-provided drawings and actual conditions. Scan findings such as reduced usable ceiling height across an entire floor compared to the offering memorandum can directly inform deal pricing. Scanning fees for mid-size acquisitions typically run in the $5,000-$8,000 range, and dimensional findings of that kind routinely support significant price adjustments in the buyer’s favor before close.
Structural condition assessments. Floor flatness F-numbers, column plumb deviation, and beam deflection are all extractable from a registered point cloud without re-mobilization. A 1mm dip over a 3m span produces an FF45 floor flatness reading. For context: FF45 is at the upper-middle range of the flatness scale, which sounds acceptable - but for a tenant installing a raised-access floor system, an FF45 substrate requires additional shimming and leveling work that a flooring sub will price at $4-8 per sq ft in additional labor. On a 20,000 sq ft data center floor, that is $80,000-$160,000 in scope the GC did not carry in their base bid. In pharmaceutical manufacturing environments subject to FDA 21 CFR Part 211, equipment slab flatness requirements are commonly stringent; a floor flatness reading that falls short of the applicable spec triggers a remediation sequence before equipment installation can proceed. The client’s licensed engineering team determines the applicable flatness threshold - the scan provides the precise, timestamped floor profile they need to make that determination.
Facade and glazing surveys. Using HDR imaging capabilities available on modern terrestrial scanners, we produce full-elevation orthophotos. At a 15-20m standoff distance - typical for a 4-6 story commercial facade scanned from grade - we achieve 1-2mm/pixel resolution in the orthophoto output. At that resolution, a 2mm crack in a precast spandrel panel is visible and measurable in the deliverable. For taller curtain wall surveys on buildings above 8 stories, we supplement with additional scan positions from upper floors and rooftop locations to maintain that standoff distance and resolution on upper panels, eliminating swing-stage rental. Spandrel alignment, curtain wall bow, and masonry displacement are all quantified in the deviation heat map. See scanning facades and glazing systems for replacement projects for workflow specifics.
Roof inspections. Slope verification, parapet height mapping, drain location and elevation - all critical for waterproofing assessments and solar or HVAC retrofit planning. Our Trimble X7 handles the open geometry and difficult access typical of commercial roofs. See laser scanning for roof inspections and slope verification for detail.
ADA compliance audits. The ANSI A117.1 standard specifies exact dimensional tolerances: ramp running slope maximum 1:12 (8.33%), ramp cross-slope maximum 1:48, door clear width minimum 32 inches (measured at 90-degree open position), accessible restroom turning radius minimum 60-inch diameter clear circle, and lavatory knee clearance minimum 27 inches high by 30 inches wide. Manual measurement of those tolerances across a full building with multiple accessible routes and restrooms takes a certified inspector 1-2 days and produces point measurements. A single scan covers every accessible route, restroom, and entrance simultaneously, and we extract all of those measurements from the cloud - the 60-inch turning radius circle, the door clear width at every accessible entry, the ramp slope at every point along its run - as a single deliverable. Borderline conditions (ramp slopes between 1:12 and 1:10, for example) are flagged with precise measurements and location coordinates rather than a pass/fail note.
Historic building documentation. Pre-condition records before renovation or following storm or fire damage are dimensionally precise in ways that photo documentation alone is not. Scan data establishes a dimensional baseline that supports design, insurance negotiations, and preservation review.
Parking structure clearance surveys. Minimum overhead clearance mapping for EV charging retrofit, sprinkler system upgrades, or structural repair is extractable directly from the point cloud - no tape and ladder required.
Accuracy, Tolerances, and What the Numbers Mean for Inspectors
The most common misunderstanding in scan procurement is conflating instrument specification with deliverable accuracy. Those are not the same number.
| Method | Typical Field Accuracy | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tape measure / manual | ±10-25mm | Operator-dependent; cumulative error across large spaces |
| Total station | ±3-5mm | High accuracy at discrete points; poor spatial coverage |
| Photogrammetry | ±5-10mm | Coverage-dependent; degrades in low-texture environments |
| Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) | ±2-3mm | Full-field coverage; ISO 17123-9 compliant instruments |
Hardware spec for the Trimble X7 is range noise of <3mm at 60m on 80% albedo targets. By the time you account for registration error, target placement tolerance, and the modeling interpretation layer (tracing a point cloud surface to a Revit wall face), realistic system accuracy for a 50,000 sq ft building is:
- Point cloud: ±3mm
- Modeled walls and floors in Revit: ±5-6mm
That is still 3-5x better than manual measurement, and it covers the entire building - not a sample of key dimensions.
ISO 17123-9 compliance is the benchmark structural engineers look for when scan-derived data feeds into a structural assessment. Our field protocols, instrument calibration logs, and registration reports are all produced to meet that standard. If your engineer is going to rely on a column position from our model, they have the full documentation chain: instrument calibration certificate, field target log, registration report with per-scan residuals and overall RMS, and the registered .E57 cloud as the source geometry.
The one caveat: when tolerances tighter than ±1mm are required - medical imaging suite floor flatness to NEBB standards, semiconductor fab floor specifications for sub-micron tool alignment - TLS is not the right tool. Those applications need a profilometer or CMM. We will tell you that upfront.
Cost: What Building Inspection Scanning Actually Costs in 2025
| Project Size | Scan + Registered Point Cloud | Add 2D CAD | Add LOD 300 Revit Model | Add Structural Deviation Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small (<5,000 sq ft) | $1,500-$2,500 | +$800-$1,500 | +$2,000-$3,500 | +$500-$1,200 |
| Mid-size (20,000-50,000 sq ft) | $4,000-$6,500 | +$1,500-$2,500 | +$3,000-$6,000 | +$1,000-$2,500 |
| Large (50,000-150,000 sq ft) | $6,500-$12,000 | +$2,500-$5,000 | +$5,000-$10,000+ | +$2,000-$5,000 |
The structural deviation report is a standalone inspection deliverable - a PDF with color-coded heat maps, out-of-tolerance element callouts, and measurement tables - that many structural engineers and CRE buyers commission without a BIM model. It answers the condition assessment question directly without the full Revit modeling cost.
Cost drivers that push price up:
- Multi-floor occupied buildings requiring after-hours access windows
- High partition density requiring more scan positions
- MEP scope in the BIM model (each discipline adds modeling time)
- Expedited turnaround (48-72 hours adds 25-40% premium)
- Coordinate system tied to external survey control
Cost drivers that bring price down:
- Vacant building with unrestricted access
- Scan-only scope (no CAD or BIM deliverable)
- Clear inspection objective with well-defined deliverable spec
- Existing drawings available to establish coordinate framework
ROI framing that holds up: a $6,000-$7,500 scanning inspection on a $3M acquisition that reveals 50mm of floor settlement - a finding completely invisible to manual inspection - can support a substantial price adjustment in the buyer’s favor. Scan cost typically runs 0.2-0.5% of acquisition or renovation cost. For a full cost breakdown, see what a laser scanning project actually costs.
How to Commission a Laser Scanning Building Inspection: What to Tell Your Provider
Here is what to have ready before you call - each item has a concrete effect on cost, accuracy, or turnaround.
1. Define the inspection objective precisely. Due diligence, structural condition assessment, ADA audit, renovation design, and insurance documentation each drive different LOD requirements and deliverable formats. “I need as-builts” is not a scope - “I need a LOD 300 Revit model so my architect can design a tenant fit-out on the third floor” is. The second version tells us instrument, station density, modeling depth, and file format before a single conversation takes place.
2. Provide existing drawings. Even decade-old drawings help. With existing drawings in hand, the field crew can plan station placement against the known column grid and use the established coordinate framework as a modeling anchor - on a 50,000 sq ft building, this typically saves 1-2 hours of office processing time (re-establishing coordinate orientation, confirming grid line positions) that you would otherwise pay for in the production line item. Without drawings, the modeler reconstructs the grid from the scan, which is possible but slower.
3. Clarify the end user and downstream application. Will a structural engineer rely on the BIM model data? Will the Revit file go to a GC for renovation pricing? Will a PDF go to an insurer? A structural engineer working from scan data needs the ISO 17123-9 calibration chain. A GC pricing from a Revit model needs wall construction types modeled, not just locations. An insurer needs the date-stamped .E57 cloud archived alongside the PDF. Each end use has specific format and documentation requirements that should be specified before the field crew mobilizes.
4. Ask for a field registration report. Any provider worth hiring produces a registration report showing per-scan residuals and overall RMS error before they leave the site on auto-registering instruments, or within hours of return on post-processed instruments. The report should list every scan station by ID, its X/Y/Z position, and the residual error vector to each overlapping neighbor. If a provider cannot produce this document - or tells you the data “looks good” without a report - they cannot verify their own accuracy, which means you cannot rely on the measurements downstream.
5. Specify deliverable formats in the contract. File formats, software versions, and coordinate systems should be locked in writing: .RCP or .E57, Revit version (2024 or 2025), .DWG version (2018 or current), coordinate system (site local, state plane, or survey-tied). To specify exactly what you need in your deliverable package, use our deliverable specification template as your starting point.
6. Negotiate timeline explicitly. Standard is 5-10 business days. Expedited 48-72 hour turnaround is available for CRE closings - get it in the contract with a penalty clause if you need hard certainty on a close date.
FAQ
How accurate is 3D laser scanning for a building inspection?
The Trimble X7 delivers range noise of <3mm at 60m on 80% albedo targets. Real-world deliverable accuracy for a typical 50,000 sq ft building is ±3mm for the registered point cloud and ±5-6mm for modeled walls and floors in Revit, once you account for registration error and modeling interpretation. That compares to ±10-25mm for manual tape measurement. ISO 17123-9 compliance is the benchmark structural engineers require when scan data feeds a structural assessment - our field protocols, calibration records, and per-scan registration reports are maintained to that standard and delivered with every project.
What deliverables do I get from a building inspection laser scan?
The full stack: registered point cloud (.RCP for Revit workflows, .E57 for open-format), 2D CAD drawings at 1:50 or 1:100 scale, Revit BIM model at LOD 200 or LOD 300, deviation heat maps comparing as-built to design intent, orthophoto elevations from HDR scan data, standalone structural deviation reports for condition assessment work, and a PDF annotation report with flagged anomalies and measurement callouts. The point cloud is the permanent evidence layer - everything else is derived from it.
Can laser scanning replace a traditional building inspection?
No - it augments rather than replaces. A licensed inspector makes condition judgments that require professional expertise and liability. Scanning provides the precise dimensional documentation that makes those judgments actionable and gives the client’s design and professional team an accurate, timestamped existing-conditions record. The inspector identifies a crack in a spandrel panel; the scanner quantifies its width to 0.5mm, establishes its 3D location, and the BIM model records it as a permanent tagged condition with coordinates. Neither party can do the other’s job.
How long does it take to laser scan a commercial building for inspection?
Field work for a 50,000 sq ft mid-rise: 4-6 hours for a 2-person crew running 30-60 scan positions. Occupied buildings with restricted access windows can extend field time by 30-50%. Registration and deliverable production: 5-10 business days. Expedited delivery (48-72 hours) is available for CRE closings. We confirm timeline at scope sign-off, not after mobilization.
What is the cost of a laser scanning building inspection?
$1,500-$2,500 minimum for small buildings under 5,000 sq ft with a point-cloud-only deliverable. $4,000-$9,000 for a mid-size commercial building with 2D CAD deliverables. $7,000-$17,000+ for a full LOD 300 Revit model. A standalone structural deviation report adds $500-$5,000 depending on building size. Key cost drivers are floor count, access conditions, and deliverable type. Scan cost typically runs 0.2-0.5% of acquisition or renovation cost - and findings from a single scan routinely trigger renegotiations worth many times the scanning fee.
Does a laser scan work on occupied buildings?
Yes. We scan occupied commercial buildings regularly. After-hours windows produce cleaner data - people and moving equipment create noise artifacts that require masking in post-processing - but we have established field protocols for occupied spaces that minimize disruption. The scanner emits no radiation and presents no health risk. Sensitive areas such as server rooms or operating labs can be scheduled as separate access windows. Review the site preparation checklist before the crew arrives to understand what we need from your facilities team ahead of mobilization.
Ready to Add 3D Scanning to Your Next Building Inspection?
Send us the building size, inspection objective, and your deliverable deadline. We scope same day and mobilize within the week.